Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Adam #EmployerBranding's avatar

Many teams default to the inside-out employer branding logic, and the authenticity argument makes sense behind it. If it is not true internally, you can do more damage than good externally.

What I see in practice though is a structural asymmetry. You can meaningfully influence the candidate experience of 100 hires by performing well for 3 to 4 weeks. Improving the employee experience of 1,000 existing employees means lifting 52 weeks of work reality.

This gap explains why so much employer branding activity stalls at recruitment marketing. Not because leaders do not care about employees, but because candidate experience is simply faster and easier to move.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?